Thank you Inas, but, honestly, my intention was never to polarize the community, I think what little of that there is GOTD has already done as a byproduct of some of it's policies. Let me PM you about your suggestion because I think you've said it a lot better than I could.
I made sure to wait at least 24 hours to post as an experiment. I wanted to see the results of Graylox' action. If you read above, Graylox said she uncensored some posts from someone who she says had their posts deleted to protect that person from "ridicule". Well, as I suspected, that ridicule never materialized. So, there was probably no need to take any action one way or the other. Which is probably just as well. This way we can, hopefully, get on to bigger and better things.
Archangel, I'm confused as to your confusion. Apparently, if you read her comment following yours, Graylox knew what you meant. And, though I don't want to drag her in to this, Inas seems to have understood it, too. So I don't know what to tell you. I don't know what's worse, not being understood or being understood too well. But, just to be sure I wasn't misjudging you, I went back and looked at many of your previous posts in recent threads. There was a common motif: many of us discuss things a lot longer than you think we should which seems to occasionally amuse you, we should be more patient, and we should remember that GOTD can do whatever it wants.
First, as I've said, I don't understand why you spend time reading threads that you think have gone on too long and why you bother to post in them. Wouldn't you be happier just frequenting other threads? Second, let me try and put your mind at rest. I'm going to take the liberty of speaking for boydcomputing, GMMan, Cacophony, Gracey, Dragonlair, PayneLessDesigns, Campy, 4shadowm, Algernon, promytius, RichardK, HappyPerson, Frique, "the dragon", and the many others you've said this to in the past, when I say: we get it, GOTD can do whatever it wants. I believe we've always gotten it.
What I'm not sure you and some others get is how this keeps happening. This is the scenario: someone new to the project or one that hasn't had the need to follow it closely until now has a problem, question, or concern and they take GOTD at it's word when it says: "If you have technical problems or suggestions on our project, please leave us a note in our forums". So they join and do just that. And then someone like me posts to let them in on the reality that we really do not know how much GOTD pays attention to what we say here and that GOTD doesn't usually admit that they have a problem, that they even know they have a problem (though they likely do because they probably DO read the comments section), and whether or not they're working on any problems. You can certainly take that last on faith, but, we're all just guessing. If you find these two statements of, if not fact, then credible observations supported by evidence to be insulting to GOTD, then all I can say is it must be because the truth hurts. And then we start discussing how many of us believe that GOTD would be better off it it would be more open. That's how it keeps happening, like it or not.
The really funny thing about all this, Archangel, is that we wouldn't have ANYWHERE NEAR the same amount of threads which deal with similar subjects, they wouldn't have even close to the same amount of frustrated complaints, and they wouldn't go on even remotely as long as they do, if GOTD would just post, "we know there's a minor bug and we're diligently working on it." Then you wouldn't have all this stuff that occasionally gets under the skin, I hope you'll admit at least a little, of you and some of the others here. Maybe you should send a comment to GOTD on that subject. It would save you from having to see some of this, which, as I said, is not going to go away no matter how many times you post that GOTD can do whatever it wants. In any case, I'm not much interested in what you think I don't understand. Like I said, bigger and better things.
I think credit should go to Robert, here. He makes the most important point, that there seems to be some progress on the issue. Like I said before, the thread's probably played out. If it was me, I'd probably leave it open a couple days just to see if anything else develops, but Robert is probably right.
One more thing, Archangel, I could PM you about this, but since you made it public in another thread, I'm going to refute it publicly in this one. I tried to in another thread, but I don't think I'm getting through. I know you think I'm disgruntled and you posted in another thread, "I'm sorry to be so blunt but one of the mod's had said you'd had asked on many occasions to moderate. Its not up to them, its up to the PTB (?) and they'd said no. Please accept that and help like the others do." It might have been better had you checked on that more closely before you posted it, or PMed me, or had that mod PM me, since it SIMPLY NEVER HAPPENED. I don't remember ever contacting GOTD or anyone else about it, and, therefore, was never contacted saying I was rejected. I mentioned it in a thread once, as a passing frustrated comment, "A heck, if you can't find anybody else, I'll do it" type of thing (actually it was about the comments page, which seems to occasionally be short of moderators, and not here). Had I actually been asked, I would have turned it down. And I also mentioned that comment in a thread once as way of saying that if they saw the previous post, they didn't think it was worth considering for whatever reason. Something I wasn't particularly tore up about. As I said before about looking at some of your posts, and I'll explain this for new members, every thread you've ever posted in is linked under your membership. So, if anybody wants to go through my old posts, they're all there for everyone to see. If any one can find some credible evidence on how I've "asked on many occasions to moderate" I'll be happy to look at it. So I don't really know what I'm supposed to accept, but it's too bad you don't think that I manage very much to be helpful. That is, of course, your opinion. Whether I'm disgruntled or not - I honestly don't think I am - I hope folks will do me the courtesy of double checking their facts before they post anything like that in the future. That sort of thing would certainly make for less "drama", no matter who it was directed towards.