LadyGodiva... Bravo! Well said!
Lee wrote....
"Using uppercase is shouting.
Amazing that since December 31st 1999 11:59:59 netiquette has gone way down hill."
Lee and the rest of the members/moderators/admin, I would like to apologize for my over-zealous use of caps in one portion of my last post.
I was merely trying to emphasize a point but I should not have used all caps to do so. You are right Lee, that was poor netiquette.
When I wrote this...
"Your quote 'When comments get out-of-hand or people become prejudicial, rude, off-topic, insulting, ugly or threatening then "yes" a moderator should be stepping in to bring some peace and order to the thread, but otherwise - let us discuss, debate, disagree, have some fun and have our say! Yeeeesh!"
You responded with....
"Which I did do."
Excuse me. No you don't Lee. You don't "let us discuss, debate, disagree, have some fun and have our say!"
You just decide for everyone, "k, nuff said" and close the thread or delete the post. And I'm not sure why you feel the need to put a timer on our discussions, or why you believe your "deletion of posts" is appropriate, acceptable behavior and conduct becoming a moderator???
You still haven't offered a reasonable explanation for the "deleting of posts" issue. And from reviewing some previous posts on this reoccurring subject, it looks like it's been a long standing problem for quite some time now. There are more appropriate ways to handle the situation than just scrapping what someone took valuable time and effort to write.
You also wrote...
"Except, no-one is going to make racist comments, no-one is going to put another down because they do or do not follow a certain religion, nor is anyone going to be sexist or xenophobic."
I can't really believe you are seriously writing that! Offensive and insulting religion- based comments were made just days ago in the "Some Rules to be Written About" thread. You were there. You closed the thread yourself! The tasteless comments weren't deleted!! Why weren't they deleted Lee? Or at least sufficiently edited. And why in the world was that thread closed in the first place?
Your solution makes no sense... The distasteful posts remain (instead of being edited) and the entire thread gets closed (instead of being steered back "on topic")?????
Sexists remarks have also been made.... heck all sorts of inappropriate behavior goes on in varying degrees... misdemeanors happen here and at every other forum daily. That's because they're visited by humans! And when offered a place to express ourselves (such as a forum) we humans can take even the most innocent "software site" and drag it "kicking and screaming" into a myriad of controversial topics without any notice. It happens on all forums! It was obviously a well know phenomenon to someone here at GAOTD ... there is after all a "General Discussion" talk area. So let us talk then!
You also said ...
"This is a software site not a politics site."
I'm not sure why you are referencing politics here. Sexist, homophobic, racial and religion based slurs are not directly related to politics. These indiscretions happen on the street, on TV, the radio and local bars all the time.
They also happen on software site forums.
You of all people are fully aware that this behavior happens even here at the "software site". Or you wouldn't have started the "Some rules to be written about" thread in the first place.
And finally Lee you stated...
As I said to another 'member' if you want a cyber battle and furnish your words with profanity and insulting behavior then goto yahoo."
Does this mean that you're a regular member on various Yahoo forums ?? Because ever since that post 2 days ago when I " quite tactfully" pointed out that your manners were a bit "rusty", you have been over-reacting, hostile and nasty in every communication you send me.
(Did it ever occur to you that maybe a quick "sorry" would have been met with an equally speedy, painless "no prob" and that would've been the end of it between us??)
The bottom line is... Members are voicing frustration with some of the moderating and noting that some of the decisions,
behaviors and actions are mimicking more along the lines of dictatorship. The power connected with the role of "forum moderator" is being abused. The "duties", "professional conduct" and "job description" of the moderator also seems to be a bit fuzzy and unclear.
Why don't we just come together, discuss what the parameters are and get it all cleared up once and for all, so that we can all ( yes 'all'...hey - it could happen) feel better about this whole ugly, reoccurring situation.