There is a review of the GODT product InPaint 3.0 with a possibly illegal act in it. The reviewer states the product "completely removed a watermark I had on 1 of my pictures". When I hear the term "watermark" I think of what photographers put on their pix on websites so people cannot take credit for THEIR work. Removing a watermark can be considered illegal. Is there a way to report such reviews?
Comments with possible illegal activities
(3 posts) (3 voices)-
Posted 13 years ago #
-
about the way you just did.
OTOH, the way it's phrased it sorta sounds like it could be one of the user's own pictures, possibly one watermarked just for testing. like you said, "Removing a watermark can be considered illegal"- but depends on a lot of things to change that "can" to an "is".
testing things like inpaint I deliberately mar one of my photos to test, but I could slap a watermark on for more intense testing. But I'm too lazy.
Posted 13 years ago # -
Jahosacat, I looked but couldn't find the review you described. Based on what you said, though, I agree with goodgotd.
Posted 13 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.