1. If you want to buy this special offer which I highly recommend despite Lee’s reply, don’t click the link given as by accident the period at the end has been included so that you’ll see an error displayed. Instead, copy all of the link except the period and paste it into your browser address bar.
2. As far as I can see (there is no precise hint on O&O’s website nor in the e-mail I got) the deadline has to be corrected to 24:00 CEST (=22:00 UTC).
3. Lee, „the promise of being up to xy% faster and better“ – isn’t this the blurb they use to make for every new major release? Would YOU buy a new version if they’d tell you or if you would assume by yourself that it’s just 3% faster or better?
Secondly, if we look one year or so ahead and imagine the release day of v12: Would someone who now is gonny buy v11 THEN have „thrown money down the toilet“ as well? He could, after all, have saved his money by waiting for a better and faster release. It soon becomes evident that this point of view reaches an impasse since you would have to wait until the final version to be sure not to waste your money. And even then, it would still be better to wait for the price to fall. Wait ... wait ... wait. I do wonder how many software programs people would have on their pc and how many software companies could survive if everybody persued this kind of consumer tactics.
4. Let me tell you why I decided to grab the offer: A countrywide well-known pc magazine tested several months ago 6 defrag tools for both XP and Vista.
O&O 10 Pro, tested for Vista (which I don’t care for since I stick to XP), got in US school marks no more than a „C“ and was found to be too expensive! Its speed values were: A) 33h 15min for defragging a 4GB partition, B) 4.26 min for copying a large file onto a second HD, C) 57sec for copying smaller files onto a second HD, D) 1.22 min for copying a large file from a second HD onto the first one’s C drive, E) 1.05 min for copying smaller files from a second HD onto the first one’s C drive, F) 2.40 min boot time, G) 13sec for loading image files, H) 7.30min for video editing.
If I had Vista, based on the above test results I certainly would never buy O&O 10 Pro, not even for 10.- Euros.
But fortunately the XP results were diametrically different from the performance shown under Vista, at least when it came to speed: O&O 10 Pro, tested for XP, gained an overwhelming victory scoring a 1,39. Opposite to that, JK Defrag 3.16 got a 2,31 , Raxco PerfectDisk a 2,54 , Diskeeper 2008 Home got a 3,20 , Microsofts „onboard“ defrag got a 3,39 and finally MST Defrag Home 2.02 a 5,00.
Here are the speed values taken from O&O 10 Pro: A) 12h 38min for defragging a 4GB partition, B) 1.02 min for copying a large file onto a second HD, C) 1.05 min for copying smaller files onto a second HD, D) 1.12 min for copying a large file from a second HD onto the first one’s C drive, E) 1.11 min for copying smaller files from a second HD onto the first one’s C drive, F) 1.12 min boot time, G) 9sec for loading image files, H) 1.43min for video editing.
Well, Lee, for 10 Euros the chances for anyone on this planet called Earth to scratch up a XP defrag tool that comes remotely near to the quality of O&O 10 Pro, IMHO can be fixed with ... Zero.
My advice to everybody: Go and get it! There are 3 and a half hours left.